Corona

1. Many wonder:
2.   There are those who are actually infected with corona and the results of the tests are negative, and there are those who say that serum tests (les tests sérologiques) are better and faster than the PCR approved by the Institute of Analysis, and there are those who say there are deaths that occurred and doctors could not classify them as suspicious Corona and they consider that doctors may have underestimated the cases ...
3. 
   
4.  *** As for les tests sérologiques, true, fast, you may get the result in minutes, but the problematic is that this analysis depends on the appearance of les anticorps in the blood that appear in the blood starting from the sixth day or more, meaning that the result can be negative and the patient really Infected with corona because his body has not yet started producing antibodies.
5.  This type of analysis can be used in general research dépistage massif, which is adopted by some countries and criticized by some scientists and specialists.
6.  *** PCR analyzes, their benefit is that they are related to the virus itself, meaning if the virus is present, it can be easily identified in 75% of cases. indétectable in this case it is also possible that this analysis gives a negative result even though the case is already corona.
7.  *** At best, the two methods can complement each other.
8.  *** I come back and say about the cases of doubt and classification of corona, .... At the present time and according to the instructions of the World Health Organization and the instructions of the Ministry of Health: the conditions are clear and every doctor can classify any case of doubt if these conditions are met .... As for If cases arise and some claim that the doctor has excluded them and then later they are confirmed cases, here are the possibilities as follows:
9.  1_ The patient was infected with the virus in a way that he could not explain to the doctor during the interrogatoire clinical question, which means the condition was simple and did not meet the conditions for suspicion cases.
10.  Since the development of the corona virus is very rapid, symptoms may worsen and may lead to death, God forbid ... and the patient at first was not originally classified as a case of doubt because he did not meet the conditions.
11.  2_The doctor does not bear the responsibility here, because the situation may be similar to the case of a simple cold or common cold that can be treated at home, and the patient as we mentioned does not meet the conditions, I mean, he did not come recently from abroad or from an affected state and did not have close contact with a confirmed case.
12.  *** What is the solution to these problems, I wonder?
13.  1_ Doctors are obligated to give utmost importance to the questions of the patient who has respiratory symptoms and consider them as well.
14.  2_ Patients and their relatives should trust the doctors and not hide any information that may be useful to them in diagnosing the condition.
15.  3_ I see and God knows that the definitions adopted by the World Health Organization will soon change, and maybe new conditions will be included to expand the circle.
16.  4_ Regarding the analysis, I see, and God knows that the PCR analysis at the present time is more secure, but the scope in the states must be expanded so that the results can be obtained quickly.
17.  5_ So that we do not fall into the problem of analyzes, which is better? And in the problem of diagnosis, who is wrong? The best solution is to not meet the Corona virus at all ... and that is only one and only solution, which is to commit to your home and protect yourself and protect others